This paper aims to discuss the implications of adopting an STS (science and technology studies)-
based conceptualization of the psychosocial work environment. We problematize how work environment
research presently divides elements of working conditions into separate physical and
psychosocial dimensions. Based on actor network theory, a currently dominant perspective in
the field of STS, we discuss the concept of sociomaterial work environment. An ANT perspective
on work environment is relevant and timely, we argue, first and foremost because more entities
are embraced in the analyses. We argue that the ANT perspective leads to a more nuanced
understanding of the work environment where it is not a set of predefined categories that is the
focus of interest, but rather the work environment as multiple locally performed aspects of agency,
translation, and collectively constructed reality. This perspective on work environment, we argue, addresses
pivotal issues raised in the work environment debate during the last ten years, for instance
of how the work environment as a concept saliently belongs to a social democratic Scandinavian
agenda in which the singular employee in a work environment context is predominantly seen as a
victim. This trope, which was peaking in the 1970s, is increasingly becoming obsolete in a changing
economy with still more flexible jobs. The contribution of this paper is to provide a presentation
and a discussion of the potentials and pitfalls provided by a shift toward a sociomaterial work
environment perspective, as well as an empirical exemplification of a sociomaterial approach to
work environment assessment.
Author Biographies
Johan Simonsen Abildgaard, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen
Ph.D. fellow
Niels Christian Mossfeldt Nickelsen, Department of Education, Aarhus University